A Woman’s Right To Choose – Is it Really Her Body?

All Great Leaders Must Pass Through the Womb of a Woman
By Rev. Wayne Perryman
March 26, 2007


During each Presidential Campaign the issue of abortions seems to always surface and discussions regarding a “woman’s right to choose.’ Many of the current candidates from both parties including Giuliani and Obama have supported the woman’s rights to choose. How would they and others who support a woman’s right to choose answer the following questions?

Isn’t the unborn the product of the woman’s egg and the man sperm?

Isn’t it impossible to have an unborn baby in the womb without both the man and the woman’s participation? If this is true, who really owns the unborn? Does it just belong to the woman?
Because she is nature’s care provider for nine months, does that mean that she has the sole right to determine the destiny of the unborn without the father’s knowledge or sanction?

Since the unborn was produce with the help of the man’s body, if he wanted the abortion, and the woman did not, does he have a say so over the portion of the unborn that his body produced?

As long as the baby is in the womb it belongs to the woman, but only when it leaves the womb that it is considered the man and he is ordered to pay child support. Why is this? If it is the man’s outside the womb, why isn’t it the man while it is inside the womb, after all if it weren’t for him it could never be in the womb?

If 17,000,000 black babies have been aborted since Roe V. Wade, why isn’t that called genocide but the death of the eight million Jews were. Don’t they know that the 17 million represent almost 50% of our current black population?

Isn’t it strange that Planned Parenthood, the agency that supports abortion and birth control is the same agency that was started by Margaret Sangler and Margaret Sangler is the same woman that started the Negro Project to control the birth rate of African Americans because she felt blacks were inferior? (Afro-Phobia)

Isn’t true that since we started having abortion, they have killed more blacks than Ku Klux Klan?

Is it a coincidence that the party that supported segregation, Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan is the same party that supports a government program that killed 17 million black babies?

Isn’t it strange that those who support abortion seems to have unlimited funds to kill black babies through abortions. but very little funds to provide pre-natal care to keep black babies alive?

Isn’t it strange that the party that worked for years to deny blacks the right to vote now support abortions, which, during the past 34 years eliminated 17 million black voters through abortions?

If blacks had 17 million more black voters, would they have more political power today?

Those who support abortions, did they know that had those 17 million citizens lived and gave an average of $100.00 a month to the black church in tithes and offerings black churches would have an average of $1,700,000,000 a month more to help citizens in their communities? Did they know if those same 17 million shopped in black communities, they could have produced millions of new jobs?

Didn’t they know that all of our great black leaders came into the world through the womb of a woman including single women like Oprah Winfrey’s mother and Jesse Jackson’s mother? Were the Margaret Sanglers of our society trying to limit the number of future black leaders from being born (Afro-Phobia)?

Isn’t today’s abortion program similar to the abortion program implemented 5,000 years ago in Egypt (Exodus 1:7-16)? (Afro-Phobia, the fear of blacks coming into power and taking over)

These are my thoughts. What are yours?

Wayne Perryman
P.O. Box 256
Mercer Island, WA 98040